PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2021 >> [2021] VUSC 24

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Public Prosecutor v National Housing Corporation [2021] VUSC 24; Criminal Appeal Case 3038 of 2020 (24 February 2021)

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction)
Criminal Appeal
Case No. 20/3038 SC/CRML

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

V

NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION

Respondent


Date of Judgment: 24th February 2021
Before: Justice Oliver Saksak
In Attendance: Mr Kevin Nathan for appellant
Mr Gregory Takau for respondent

JUDGMENT


Background

  1. The respondent (the NHC) was charged in the Magistrates Court with 9 counts of failures to pay monthly contributions to its employees through the VNPF. This failure contravened sections 26 (1) and 50(1) of the Vanuatu National Provident Fund Act [CAP.189].
  2. A Magistrate in the Court below dismissed the charges against the NHC.
  3. This appeal is against that dismissal.

Grounds

  1. The appeal is founded on 3 grounds that:
(a) The Magistrate erred by ruling there was delay warranting the dismissal.
(b) The Magistrate erred in dismissing the case without a fair trial.
(c) The Magistrate erred in not adjourning the case despite being informed of the unavailabity of counsel at the hearing.

Reliefs

  1. The appellant seeks orders that-
(a) The appeal be allowed.
(b) The Orders of the Magistrates Court be overturned.
(c) The case be remitted to the Magistrates Court for fixture and hearing.
(d) Costs be paid by the respondent.

Management of Appeal

  1. On 3rd December 2020 the Court called the appeal for review. The respondent was not present due to lack of service and was adjourned to 7th December.
  2. On 7th December 2020 the respondent did not appear despite NHC was served. The Court issued directions requiring the appellant to file Appeal Books with submissions by 22/1/2021. The Court adjourned the hearing to 5th February 2021 giving opportunity to NHC to file responses by 31st January 2021.
  3. On 5th February 2021 due to a long criminal plea list counsel agreed to a 14 days adjournment to allow the respondent to file responses and submissions. The Court directed that those submissions be filed by 19th February 2021. The Court adjourned the hearing to 24th February 2021 at 10:00am.

Concession

  1. Today (24 February 2021) at 10:00am, Mr Takau attended and admitted that NHC had conceded the appeal, thus explaining why NHC has not filed any responses and submissions. Counsel conceded also that the case should be remitted to the Magistrates Court for fixture and hearing.

Result

  1. In light of the concession made by counsel for the respondent, this appeal is allowed.

Orders

  1. The formal orders are:-
(a) The appeal is allowed
(b) The Decision and orders of the Magistrate’s Court dated 16th October 2020 are hereby quashed.
(c) The case is remitted to the Magistrates Court for fixture and hearing.
(d) There is no order as to costs.

DATED at Port Vila this 24th day of February 2021

BY THE COURT


OLIVER.A.SAKSAK

Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2021/24.html