PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2021 >> [2021] VUSC 110

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Henry v Malicum [2021] VUSC 110; Civil Case 2835 of 2020 (14 May 2021)

IN THE SUPREME COURTOF
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Civil Jurisdiction)
Civil Case No. 20/2835 CC/CIVL

BETWEEN:
Joe Henry
Claimant
AND:
Johnny Malicum & Larisa Ioloukapalu
First Defendants
AND:
Paradise Beach Sub-Division
Second Defendant
AND:
Rainbow Estate Limited
Third Defendant



Judge : Justice Oliver.A.Saksak


Counsel: Mr Roger Tevi for the Claimant
No appearances for the Defendants


Date: 14th May 2021

_________________________________________________
JUDGMENT

__________________________________________________________________________________

Background

  1. The claimant filed proceedings on 15th October 2020 seeking:
  2. The claimant was duly served on the First and Second Defendants on 26th October 2020.
  3. The defendants have not filed any defences and/or responses.

Default Judgment

  1. Default Judgment was entered on 8th February 2021 for the principal debt of VT 2.100.000 at 10% as interest.
  2. Damages was to be assessed pending further evidence and submissions.
  3. On 28th April 2021 the claimant withdrew claim for damages for breach of agreement.
  4. Directions were issued for the filing of submissions as to general damages. And interest on the general damages was reduced to 5% per annum when Counsel agreed to the reduction as proposed by the Court.

Submissions

  1. The claimant filed written submissions on 6th May 2021.
  2. The defendants have still not filed any responses and/or submissions.

Discussion

  1. It is regrettable that the defendants despite service have not taken any steps to make known their positions in relation to the claim.
  2. The Civil Procedure Rules provide clear time periods for the filing of claims, responses and defences. Where those time periods have lapsed after a claim has been filed, a claimant may proceed with his claim by seeking default judgment or summary judgment if a defence has been filed, but with no prospect of success.
  3. The claimant has taken the default route because there has been no defence filed by the defendants.
  4. The claimant has had judgment by default for the principal debt of VT 2.100.000. His claim for damages for breach of agreement has been withdrawn.
  5. His only remaining claim was for general damages to be assessed by the Court.
  6. He claims for the sum of VT 648,200 with interest and costs.
  7. The claimant filed his evidence in support of his claim for general damages on 15 October 2020. He annexes receipts and invoices.
  8. The claimant’s evidence is unchallenged.
  9. With the written submissions filed on 6th May 2021 the claimants set out in paragraph 4 a Table of Costs and expenses totalling VT648,200.
  10. Those figures are not challenged by the defendants.

Finding

  1. Accordingly, I find the appropriate amount of general damages to be awarded in favour of the claimant is VT 648,200.
  2. Interest is added to the sum of VT 648,200 at 5% per annum from the date of filing of claim to the date of payment.
  3. The claimant is entitled to his costs fixed at VT 100.000.

DATED at Port Vila this 14th day of May 2021

BY THE COURT


Oliver.A.Saksak

Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2021/110.html