You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Vanuatu >>
2021 >>
[2021] VUSC 110
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Henry v Malicum [2021] VUSC 110; Civil Case 2835 of 2020 (14 May 2021)
IN THE SUPREME COURTOF OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU (Civil Jurisdiction) | Civil Case No. 20/2835 CC/CIVL |
BETWEEN: | Joe Henry Claimant |
AND: | Johnny Malicum & Larisa Ioloukapalu First Defendants |
AND: | Paradise Beach Sub-Division Second Defendant |
AND: | Rainbow Estate Limited Third Defendant |
Judge : Justice Oliver.A.Saksak
Counsel: Mr Roger Tevi for the Claimant
No appearances for the Defendants
Date: 14th May 2021
_________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
__________________________________________________________________________________
Background
- The claimant filed proceedings on 15th October 2020 seeking:
- (a) A refund of VT 2.100.000, (b) damages for breach of agreement at VT 1.000.000, (c) general damages at VT 648,200, (d) interest
at 10% and (e) costs.
- The claimant was duly served on the First and Second Defendants on 26th October 2020.
- The defendants have not filed any defences and/or responses.
Default Judgment
- Default Judgment was entered on 8th February 2021 for the principal debt of VT 2.100.000 at 10% as interest.
- Damages was to be assessed pending further evidence and submissions.
- On 28th April 2021 the claimant withdrew claim for damages for breach of agreement.
- Directions were issued for the filing of submissions as to general damages. And interest on the general damages was reduced to 5%
per annum when Counsel agreed to the reduction as proposed by the Court.
Submissions
- The claimant filed written submissions on 6th May 2021.
- The defendants have still not filed any responses and/or submissions.
Discussion
- It is regrettable that the defendants despite service have not taken any steps to make known their positions in relation to the claim.
- The Civil Procedure Rules provide clear time periods for the filing of claims, responses and defences. Where those time periods have
lapsed after a claim has been filed, a claimant may proceed with his claim by seeking default judgment or summary judgment if a defence
has been filed, but with no prospect of success.
- The claimant has taken the default route because there has been no defence filed by the defendants.
- The claimant has had judgment by default for the principal debt of VT 2.100.000. His claim for damages for breach of agreement has
been withdrawn.
- His only remaining claim was for general damages to be assessed by the Court.
- He claims for the sum of VT 648,200 with interest and costs.
- The claimant filed his evidence in support of his claim for general damages on 15 October 2020. He annexes receipts and invoices.
- The claimant’s evidence is unchallenged.
- With the written submissions filed on 6th May 2021 the claimants set out in paragraph 4 a Table of Costs and expenses totalling VT648,200.
- Those figures are not challenged by the defendants.
Finding
- Accordingly, I find the appropriate amount of general damages to be awarded in favour of the claimant is VT 648,200.
- Interest is added to the sum of VT 648,200 at 5% per annum from the date of filing of claim to the date of payment.
- The claimant is entitled to his costs fixed at VT 100.000.
DATED at Port Vila this 14th day of May 2021
BY THE COURT
Oliver.A.Saksak
Judge
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2021/110.html