Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(CIVIL JURISDICTION)
CIVIL CASE No: 71 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
AND:
IN THE MATTER OF THE MUNICIPALITIES ACT
[CAP 126], AS AMENDED
BETWEEN:
UNION ELECTRIQUE DE VANUATU
LIMITED
Claimant
AND:
MUNICIPALITY OF PORT VILA
Defendant
MESSRS. GEORGE VASARIS & CO, Port Vila, Vanuatu, for the Claimant
MESSRS. GEOFFREY GEE & PARTNERS, Port Vila, Vanuatu, for the Defendant
CONSENT ORDERS
UPON HEARING the parties hereto and BY CONSENT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. A declaration that the "Levying of Fee on Installation of Street Electrical Lamp Posts, Power Transformers and Cable Bye-Law No. 13 of 2000" made by the Port Vila Municipality on 29 June 2000 in purported exercise of the powers vested in that Municipality by section 26 and section 36, subsections (1) and (2) of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126] is invalid.
2. Order that the Port Vila Municipality be restrained from requiring the payment to it by the Claimant of the amount calculated according to the terms of the said Bye-Law No. 13 of 2000.
3. A declaration that the "Levying of Fees on Installation of Pressure Valves, Water Mains and Water Tanks Bye-Law No. 15 of 2000" made by the Port Vila Municipality on 29 June 2000 in purported exercise of the powers vested in that Municipality by section 26 and section 36, subsections (1) and (2) of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126], is invalid.
4. Order that the Port Vila Municipality be restrained from requiring the payment to it by the Claimant of the amount calculated according to the terms of the said Bye-Law No. 15 of 2000.
5. A declaration that the "Commission on Electricity Bye-Law No. 19 of 2000" made by the Port Vila Municipality on 29 June 2000" in purported exercise of the powers vested in that Municipality by section 36 of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126] is invalid.
6. Order that the Port Vila Municipality be restrained from requiring the payment to it by the Claimant of the amount calculated according to the terms of the said Bye-Law No. 19 of 2000.
7. A declaration that the "Levying of Fees on Cutting up and Digging of Roads Bye-Law No. 38 of 2000" made by the Port Vila Municipality on 12 July 2000" in purported exercise of the powers vested in that Municipality by section 36, subsections (1) and (2) of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126] is invalid.
8. Order that the Port Vila Municipality be restrained from requiring the payment to it by the Claimant of the amount calculated according to the terms of the said Bye-Law No. 38 of 2000.
9. A declaration that the "Levying of Fees (Footpaths and Roadsides) Bye-Law No. 39 of 2000" made by the Port Vila Municipality on 12 July 2000" in purported exercise of the powers vested in that Municipality by section 36, subsections (1) and (2) of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126] is invalid.
10. Order that the Port Vila Municipality be restrained from requiring the payment to it by the Claimant of the amount calculated according to the terms of the said Bye-Law No. 39 of 2000.
11. A declaration that the "Commission from water charges Bye-Law No. 42 of 2000" made by the Port Vila Municipality on 12 July 2000" in purported exercise of the powers vested in that Municipality by section 36 of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126] is invalid.
12. Order that the Port Vila Municipality be restrained from requiring the payment to it by the Claimant of the amount calculated according to the terms of the said Bye-Law No. 42 of 2000.
13. Further the said Bye-Laws No's: 13, 15, 19, 38, 39 and 42 of 2000 are ultra vires Article 25(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Vanuatu.
14. Further the said Bye-Laws No's: 13, 15, 19, 38, 39 and 42 of 2000 are ultra vires section 38 of the Municipalities Act [CAP 126], as amended.
15. Costs to the Claimant taxed if not agreed.
Dated the 2 day of October 2003.
BY THE COURT
BY CONSENT
JOHN GALDWELL MALCOLM | MARK JAMES HURLEY |
Advocate for the Defendant | Advocate for the Claimant |
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2003/138.html