PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 1999 >> [1999] VUSC 20

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Public Prosecutor v Sarvum [1999] VUSC 20; Criminal Case No 004 of 1999 (16 April 1999)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF

p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: centecenter; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU

HELD AT LUGANVILLE/SANTO

(Criminal Jurisdiction)

<

CrimCase No. 4 of 1999

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR<

-VS-

FABRISIO SARVUM

Coram: Mr Justice Oliver A Saksak

> Mr William Falau, Clerk of Court

Counsel:ector Wilson Garae, State Prosecutor for Public Prosecutor

Mr Hillary Toa for the Defendant

SENTENCE

Charge: Unlawful Sexual Intercourse contrary to section 97(1) of the Penal Code Act [C5]

Plea: Guilty

<

This defendant appears before me charged with unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl of 8 years old. He pleads guilty to the charge.

The incident took place at Port Olry, East Santo on 27th March 1999 in a kitcouse. The defendant asked ked the victim where her parents had gone to and was told that they had gone to the garden. On hearing this the defendant asked the victim to go into the kitchen house where he locked the door, put a sack on the ground and asked the girl to lay down. The defendant then removed the girl's pants and his own clothes and had sexual intercourse with the girl. She felt a lot of pain and saw blood. He told the girl to tell a lie to her parents if they discovered and enquired. Indeed she was found out and taken to the local clinic to be examined the next day. Examination revealed a ruptured hymen, bruises around the vaginal walls, a little bleeding and pain.

On the defendant's own ple guilty and the evidence from the prosecution witnesses read and referred to by by the Prosecutor, the Court enters a conviction against the defendant.

In mitigation I am told that the defendant is 18 years old in a family of 5 plus onpted child. He left seft school in 1993 at class 6. He has been in the village all his life with no exposure to the outside world, even another island of Vanuatu. I am told that the defendant is a shy boy who is sometimes withdrawn in character. He seems to be illiterate and had to be assisted by his village chief as interpreter when giving his statement to the police. I am told that the defendant never had any previous sexual experiences and that this was his first experience I am told that the defendant developed the idea when he watched some videos which are being shown in his village by someone commercially. I am told that he is extremely sorry and remorseful for what he did and has undertaken in Court that it would be his last. I am told that the defendant is a first offender with no previous convictions. That he co-operated fully with the police beginning at the time he came all the way from Port Olry to Luganville and voluntarily presented himself to the police.

Further that he admitted the offence freely in Court today. It is submitted fence Counsel that the Court should take these factors into account when sentencing the defendant and he impressed upon the Court not to impose a custodial sentence but a suspended prison term only.

Finally I am told that a cary ceremony has taken place on 29th March 1999 whereby they the parents of the defendant paid the sum of vt20,000 to the parents of the victim. There was shaking of hands indicating peace and reconciliation.

The Court is very concerned at he way bad videos are being shown and exposed even over ther the national television without much or better control to the detriment of our young people. They stand the risks of committing these offences because they see these things in videos or television or even books. Better controls ought to be taken by appropriate authorities and those concerned as they should be made to be responsible also when young persons such as this defendant get involved in these offences. In any event the choice and will to commit an offence was the defendant's and only he can be responsible.

ass="MsoNoMsoNormal" style="margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> Considering all has been said on his behalf I consider that the most appropriate sentence this Court ourt can impose is a jail term of 12 months or one year commencing on 6th April, 1999 when the defendant was first remanded in custody, unless he chooses to appeal in which case he has 14 days.

lass="MsoNoMsoNormal" style="margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> DATED at Luganville this 16th day of April, 1999.

ass="MsoNormal" style="marg"margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1">

class="MsoNoMsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> BY THE COURT

OLIVER A SAKSAK

Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/1999/20.html