HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS

Case name: 	R v Poloso 	
		
Citation:		
		
Date of decision: 	26 February 2026	
		
Parties: 	Rex v Nason Poloso 	
		
Date of hearing: 	25 February 2026	
		
Court file number(s): 	30 of 2025	
		
Jurisdiction: 	Criminal 	
		
Place of delivery: 		
		
Judge(s): 	Kouhota; PJ	
		
On appeal from:		
		
Order:	Total imprisonment is 7 years imprisonment minus time spend in custody since your arrest.
IRA	
		
Representation: 	Cleven M for the Crown 
Rusi E for the Accused 	
		
Catchwords: 		
		
Words and phrases:		
		
Legislation cited:	Penal Code (Amendment) (Sexual Offences) Act 2016, S 139 (2) (a), S 136 (a) (b) 
Penal Code S 136 F (1) (a), 	
		
Cases cited:	R v Pao [2025] SBCA 25, 	

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

Criminal Case No. 30 of 2025

REX 

V

NASON POLOSO 

Date of Hearing; 25 February 2026
Date of Ruling: 26 February 2026

For the Crown; Cleven M
For the Accused; Rusi E
SENTENCE 
Kouhota PJ
The Accused Nason Poloso was charge with 2 offences, one count of indecent act on a child contrary to section 139 (2) (a) and one count of rape contrary to section 136 F (a) (b) both offences under the Penal Code (Amended) (Sexual offences) Act 2016.
By amended information by the DPP on 4th November 2025, the prosecution alleged that the accused Qalotaba Poloso on an unknown date between 1st January and 31st December 2023 at his house at Tangibangara village, Choiseul province did indecently assaulted S.F a child under 15 years of age, namely 12 years old, by rubbing her clitoris several times.
The second charge was rape contrary to section 136 F (1) (a) of the Penal Code. By amended information filed by the DPP on 14th November 2025, the prosecution alleged that the accused Nason Qalotaba Poloso on an unknown date between 1st September 2024 to 30th September 2024 at his house at Tangibangara village, Choiseul province did have sexual intercourse with C.P.1 without her consent, and knowing or being neckless as to the lack of consent.
The facts show that the accused on two different dates committed the offences. On the first occasion at his house he had indecently assaulted the first victim, a child of 12 years old by rubbing her clitoris several times. On the second occasion he told the victim to go into his house, took her into his room, locked the door of the room and told the victim to lay down. He poured what was said to be custom medicine on her vagina and then licked her vagina.
The Court in considering the appropriate sentence to impose took into account the aggravating and mitigating factors submitted by counsels. The Court also took the following as mitigating factor in your favour, that you are 79 years old and had been a person of good character for that long. Secondly that you pleaded guilty to the two charges thus saving the Court and every one else’s time.
However, there are aggravating factors in the offences you had committed the first stage disparity between you and the victims, the victims of the of the offence of indecent assault is a 12 years old girl and the victim of the rape was a nine year girl. This means there is a disparity of 67 years for the victim of indecent assault and 70 years for the victim of rape. From the facts, it can also be safely inferred that the offence of rape was premeditated because you called the victim into your room, locked the room and pretend that you are performing some sort of custom on her by pouring what is said to be custom medicine on her vagina then licking her vagina. You use deception to involved on penetration, your action is still considered abhorrent.
The offences for which you are convicted are serious offences. The offence of indecent assault carries a penalty of 7 years imprisonment and the offence of rape carries a penalty of life imprisonment. In considering the sentences to impose I take into account that you are an old man of 79 years and that any long sentence may severely affect your physical wellbeing. I had also taken into account the decision of the Court Appeal in Criminal case No.66 of 2024 Rex V Ellizah Tinae Pao. I however consider the charges and the facts in your case are not as serious as in the case of R-v-Pao.
After considering the facts of the two charges, the submission of counsels, the case authorities referred to by counsel and all the circumstances surrounding this case. I consider the following sentence are appropriate and I will impose on you as follows;
1. 	For the offence of indecent assault, I sentence you to 2 years imprisonment and 
2. 	For the offence of rape, I sentence you to 5 years imprisonment. 
The sentence are to run consecutively and time spend in custody is to be counted as part of the sentence.
Total imprisonment is 7 years imprisonment minus time spend in custody since your arrest.
IRA 
THE COURT
Justice Emmanuel Kouhota
Puisne Judge