Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Customary Land Appeal Court of Solomon Islands |
IN THE GUADALCANAL CUSTOMARY
LAND APPEAL COURT
CLAC case number: 6 of 1998
Customary land ownership Appellant Jurisdiction
IN THE MATTER OF: THE LOCAL COURT ACT [CAP 144]
AND
THE LANDS AND TITLE ACT (CAP 93)
IN THE MATTER OF: BOROKOKO CUSTOMARY LAND APPEAL
BETWEEN:
HENRY KOLITOGHE
Appellant
AND:
PHILI BUTO
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Brief background of the case
Ground 1
- The Guadalcanal Local Court is erred to consider the central issue that Managu was only adopted, hence, the Respondent should not claim ownership through her as there was no significant customary ceremony for her to own land.
Ground 2
- The GLC failed to considered the fact dispite our great grandfathers originated from Waisisi, we both have landed at Bo'o under different tribal heads, ie. The Respondent under the man call Atana and the Appellant under the tribe of Nekama, thus we should not have the same rights as principal owners.
Ground 3
- The GLC failed to consider that Managu did not born together with late Kolitoghe, as such the Respondent should not be regarded as principal owners.
Ground 4
- The GLC has insufficient evidence before, to conclude that the Appellant and respondent have the same rights of ownership of Korokoko land.
Ground 1;
Ground 2
Ground 3
Ground 4
Order
- The ruling of the Guadalcanal Local Court held on 12th of May 1998 is set aside;
- The matter is remitted back to the same local court (Guadalcanal Local Court) (GLC) to be heard by new Local Court members.
- Each party to bear their own cost.
Decision was verbally announced on ..................... and written judgment delivered on dated this.......22nd May 2015.
Signed:
1. John SEKETALA | (President) |
2. Fr. John GATU | (Member VP) |
3. Martin TSUKI | (Member ) |
4. Henry LUI | (Member) |
5. William Rex POCHO | (Member) |
6. Jim SEUIKA | Clerk/Member |
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBCLAC/2015/3.html