PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands >> 1974 >> [1974] TTLawRp 50

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Jitiam v Acme Importers [1974] TTLawRp 50; 7 TTR 95 (1 August 1974)

7 TTR 95


"IROIJ LABLAB" MO JITIAM and TOKBAR ISHIGURO;
"ALAB" IOANE T. and "DRI JERBAL" NEIKWOJ, including
all other members of the "IROIJ", "ALAB", and "DRI JERBAL'S BWIJ"
who hold any and all interests in the landlease in question, including CHIHAYA
ANMONTA, heir to "IROIJ LABLAB'S" interests in the same land and lease,
Plaintiffs


v.


ACME IMPORTERS and SHIGERU WASE,
Defendants


Civil Action No. 6-73
Trial Division of the High Court
Marshall Islands District


August 1, 1974


Action to cancel lease. The Trial Division of the High Court, Turner, Associate Justice, held that issue of cost of lessee's improvements, to be paid lessee by lessor, under the lease agreement, on cancellation of the lease, could, by agreement of the parties, be submitted to arbitration.

1. Arbitration—Trials

In the absence of a statutory prohibition, arbitration may, as a matter of common law, be used to decide a disputed issue of fact at a trial, provided the parties so agree.

2. Arbitration—Arbitration Contracts

An arbitration agreement is a contract and subject to the same rules of law as to interpretation and enforcement as any other contract, and the mere fact that litigants orally agree to submit a question to arbitration does not make the contract any less enforceable.

3. Judgments—Interest

Generally, interest does not run on an unliquidated claim until after judgment, though it may be allowed in special situations from the time of filing of suit.

4. Judgments—Interest

Where lease did not provide for interest to run on the cost of improvements, to be paid lessee in the event of termination of the lease, interest could be recovered only as of the time of judgment, not as of the time of filing of suit.
Assessors: KABUA KABUA, District Court Presiding Judge, and MORRIS JALLY, District Court Associate Judge
Interpreters: OKTAN DAMON and MILTON ZAKIOS
Counsel for Plaintiffs: JOHN R. HEINE
Counsel for Defendants: JERRY KRAMER


TURNER, Associate Justice

This action involves a lease of valuable downtown property in DUD Municipality, Majuro Atoll, the Marshall Islands District center. The court is called upon to interpret and enforce the lease provisions.

Plaintiffs sought to cancel the lease because of its assignment by the original lessee to the defendants. The defendants seek to recover "the reasonable cost of all improvements . . . . permanently attached to the premises." The lease provides that in the event of the lessors' determination to terminate the lease (for cause, omitted but implied) after notice given:


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/other/TTLawRp/1974/50.html