PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Nauru

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Nauru >> 2016 >> [2016] NRSC 31

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Dabwido v Republic of Nauru [2016] NRSC 31; Case 80 of 2016 (17 November 2016)

2016_3100.png
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NAURU

AT YAREN

[CRIMINAL DIVISION] Case No. 80 of 2016


IN THE MATTER OF a variation of Bail in District Court Case No.’s 21, 22, 23 and 25 of 2015


BETWEEN: SPRENT DABWIDO Applicant/Defendant


AND


THE REPUBLIC OF NAURU Respondent


Before: J. E. Crulci, A/ CJ

Applicant: V. Clodumar

Respondent: D. Toganivalu


Date of Hearing: 17 November 2016

Date of Ruling: 17 November 2016


CATCHWORDS– Application for Bail variation – Variation granted – Applicant waives rights under sec 155(1) Criminal Procedure Code if fails to return to jurisdiction


RULING


  1. On the 4 November 2016 the Applicant appealed to His Excellency the President against a decision made by the Minister for Justice and Border Control, notified to the Applicant on the 14 October 2016, denying the application for a new Nauruan passport.
  2. On the 10 November 2016 His Excellency the President informed the Applicant that in light of the Applicant’s serious medical condition his application was granted and a new passport would be issued to him.
  3. Passport NN021168 was issued on the 11 November 2016 and given into the care of the Court.
  4. The Applicant applies to have his bail conditions varied to allow him to travel to Australia to seek medical treatment.
  5. The Applicant has provided three sureties as follows: KrentDabwido in the sum of $2,000.00 (two thousand dollars) on his own recognizance; Donovan Dabwido in the sum of $1,500.00 (one thousand five hundred dollars) on his own recognizance; and StarrionAkken in the sum of $1,500.00 (one thousand five hundred dollars) on his own recognizance.
  6. The sureties have previously been examined by the Court on 26 August 2016, and the Court was satisfied that each of them has the means and ability to pay the respective amount of recognizance should they be called upon to do so.
  7. The Applicant has given signed consent to the commencement of trial in the District Court of matters 21, 22, 23 and 25 of 2015 should the Applicant not have returned to Nauru when the trials start. The Applicant states to this Court that he understands the consequences of his failure to attend the above mentioned trial.
  8. The Applicant’s bail is varied as follows:

-------------------------------------------------

J.E. Crulci, Acting Chief Justice


Dated 17 November 2016


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/nr/cases/NRSC/2016/31.html