PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2023 >> [2023] FJHC 198

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Sauturaga - Sentence [2023] FJHC 198; HAC70.2023 (4 April 2023)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION


Crim. Case No: HAC 70 of 2023


BETWEEN:


STATE

PROSECUTION


A N D:


SAILOSI SAUTURAGA

ACCUSED PERSON


Counsel : Mr. Z. Zunaid for the State

Ms. R. Nabainivalu for Accused


Date of Sentence : 04th April 2023


SENTENCE


  1. Mr. Sailosi Sauturaga, you are charged with one count of Act Intended to Cause Grievous Harm, contrary to Section 255 (a) of the Crimes Act, which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The particulars of the offence are:

COUNT 1


State of Offence

ACTS INTENDED TO CAUSE GRIEVOUS HARM: Contrary to Section 255 (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.


Particulars of Offence

SAILOSI SAUTURAGA on the 31st day of January 2023, at Nausori in the Eastern Division, with intent to cause grievous harm to LOATA TABUA, unlawfully wounded the said LOATA TABUA by striking her with a knife.


  1. You pleaded guilty to this offence on the 22nd of March, 2023. Having satisfied that you have fully comprehended the legal effect of your plea and that it was voluntary and free from force and influence, I now convict you of the said offence of Act Intended to Cause Grievous Harm.
  2. The Summary of Facts, which you admitted in Court, states that you are married to the Complainant. On the night of the 31st of January 2023, an argument occurred between you and the Complainant as you alleged the Complainant was having an affair. You then took a cane knife and struck the Complainant with it. In doing that, you cut off four of the Complainant’s fingers and also wounded her on her right thigh.
  3. The acceptable tariff for the offence of the Act Intended to Cause Grievous Harm is two (2) to six (6) years of imprisonment. (The State v Pauliasi Yasa, Criminal Case No. HAC 044 of 2012S, State v Masicola [2015] FJHC 411; HAC081.2014S (the 5th of June 2015), Felix Patel v State Criminal Appeal No HAA 030 of 2011 (the 27th of October 2011).
  4. An Act Intended to Cause Grievous Harm is one of the serious forms of offence against a person. Hence, the objective seriousness of this matter is high. According to the Medical Examination Form, the Complainant had suffered substantial injuries and pain. Therefore, the level of harm in this offence is also high. You reacted angrily and violently. Accordingly, the level of your culpability in this offence is substantially high.
  5. The learned Counsel for the Defence submitted that you are a first offender and pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity. I find that you have shown your remorse and repentance for committing this crime by pleading guilty and making an admission in your record of caution interview. Therefore, you are entitled to a substantial discount and leniency for your previous good character, an early guilty plea, and remorse.
  6. Considering the above reasons, I sentence you to three (3) years imprisonment for this offence as charged. Your sentence is partially suspended, where you shall serve two (2) years of your sentence immediately, and the remaining period of one (1) year is suspended for three (3) years.
  7. Having considered the seriousness of this crime, the purpose of this sentence, your age, and opportunities for rehabilitation, I find one (1) year of the non-parole period would serve the purpose of this sentence. Hence, you are not eligible for parole for one (1) year pursuant to Section 18 (1) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act.
  8. Considering the time spent in custody (nearly two months), the actual period you have to serve in custody is one (1) year and ten (10) months imprisonment with ten (10) months of non-parole period.
  9. If you commit any crime during this three (3) years and are found guilty by the Court, you are liable to be charged and prosecuted for an offence according to Section 28 of the Sentencing and Penalties Act.
  10. Since this incident involves domestic violence, I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to consider making an order under the Domestic Violence Act. I accordingly make a Permanent Domestic Violence Restraining Order against the accused with standard non-molestation conditions pursuant to sections 24 and 28 of the Domestic Violence Act. The above Domestic Violence Restraining Order will be in force until this Court or any other competent court is varied or suspended. Furthermore, if you breach this restraining order, you will be charged and prosecuted for an offence pursuant to Section 77 of the Domestic Violence Act.
  11. Thirty (30) days to appeal to the Fiji Court of Appeal.

.................................................
Hon. Mr. Justice R.D.R.T. Rajasinghe


At Suva
04th April 2023


Solicitors
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the State.
Office of the Legal Aid Commission for the Accused.



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2023/198.html