PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2021 >> [2021] FJHC 316

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Bogitini - Sentence [2021] FJHC 316; HAC34.2021 (19 November 2021)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LABASA
[CRIMINAL JURISDICTION]
Criminal Case No.: HAC 34 of 2021


BETWEEN : STATE


AND : 1. TIMOUTA BOGITINI
2. HARRY BILLY WILLIAM SIMPSON
3. SAIRUSI BATIWACI


Counsel : Ms J. Fatiaki for the State
Ms R. Raj for the First Accused
Mr P. Gade for the Second Accused
Ms S. Devi for the Third Accused

Dates of Hearing : 17 November 2021
Date of Sentence : 19 November 2021


SENTENCE


  1. On 6 May 2021, the three Accused in the company of each other broke into the dwelling home of the victim and stole a range of assorted liquor and candy to a total value of $4750.00. They were charged with aggravated burglary and theft. Following their arrest, all three Accused confessed to the burglary and theft, and with their cooperation the police recovered a substantial stolen property from them.
  2. All three Accused have pleaded guilty at the first opportunity. They are young and first time offenders. Bogitini and Batiwaci are 18 years old while Simpson is 21 years old. All three are unemployed. They sustain themselves by farming.
  3. The mitigating factors are their early guilty pleas, cooperation with police in the recovery ofen items, young age and thed their previous good character. Also, court’s time and resources have been saved by their guilty pleas.
  4. The statutory aggravation is that the burglary was committed in the company of others. The maximum penalty for aggravated burglary is 17 years imprisonment. The tariff is 18 months to 3 years imprisonment (Leqavuni v State [2016] FJCA 31; AAU0106.2014 (26 February 2016)).
  5. The aggravating factors are that a home was burgled and the offence is prevalent in our community. The main purpose of sentence is deterrence, both special and general.
  6. The offences are part of one transaction. An aggregate sentence is appropriate. I piyears as a starting pong point. I adjust the sentence for the mitigating and aggravating factors and arrive at a term of 18 months imprisonment.
  7. All three Accused are convicted and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment. I have considered suspension and decided to suspend the sentence. All three Accused have spent 6 months in custody on remand. They are young and have accepted responsibility for their criminal conduct by pleading guilty. Their remorse is genuine. These are special circumstances to suspend the term of imprisonment for 2 years.

............................................

Hon. Mr Justice Daniel Goundar


Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the State
Legal Aid Commission for the Accused



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2021/316.html