PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2020 >> [2020] FJHC 394

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Ratumaidravuwalu - Sentence [2020] FJHC 394; HAC021.2019S (9 June 2020)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 021 OF 2019S


STATE
Vs

SALACIELI RATUMAIDRAVUWALU


Counsels : Ms. K. Semisi for State
Mr. J. Korotini for Accused
Hearings : 2, 3, 4 and 5 June, 2020.
Summing Up : 8 June, 2020.
Judgment : 8 June, 2020.
Sentence : 9 June, 2020.


______________________________________________________________________________

SENTENCE
______________________________________________________________________________


  1. In a judgment delivered yesterday, the court found you guilty and convicted you on the following two counts in the information:

“COUNT 1

Statement of Offence

RAPE: Contrary to section 207 (1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.


Particulars of Offence

SALACIELI RATUMAIDRAVUWALU between the 1st day of October 2018 and

the 31st day of October 2018 at Lami in the in the Central Division had carnal

knowledge of MTN without her consent.


COUNT 3

Statement of Offence

RAPE: Contrary to section 207 (1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.


Particulars of Offence

SALACIELI RATUMAIDRAVUWALU on the 4th day of November 2018 at Lami

in the in the Central Division had carnal knowledge of MTN without her consent.”


  1. The brief facts were as follows. You were 62 years old at the time of the offences. The complainant (PW1) was your daughter and 15 years old at the time of the offences. At your house, in your own bedroom, on two separate occasions as alleged in the above counts, you forced yourself on the complainant and had sex with her, without her consent. At the time of offences, you knew she was not consenting to sex with you because she told you to stop. Yet you ignored her protest and continued to offend against her, and you told her “you are the boss of her body”. You had been tried and convicted in the High Court.
  2. The offence of rape carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment (see Section 207 (1) of the Crimes Act 2009). Parliament therefore views the offence as a serious one. It violates the dignity of a person. It is an unwarranted intrusion into the privacy of a person. It is an ultimate act of showing utter disrespect to a person. Therefore those who commit this offence, must expect a lengthy prison sentence to restore the balance, the harmony and atonement to the victim. For the rape of child, that is, anyone less than 18 years old, the tariff is a sentence between 11 and 20 years imprisonment. I refer to the authority of Gordon Aitcheson v The State, Criminal Petition CAV 012 of 2018, Supreme Court of Fiji. Of course, the final sentence will depend on the mitigating and aggravating factors.
  3. The aggravating factors were as follows:
  4. The mitigating factors were as follows:
  5. On count no. 1, I start with a sentence of 14 years imprisonment. For the aggravating factors, I add 4 years, making a total sentence of 18 years imprisonment. For time already served while remanded in custody awaiting trial, I deduct 1 year 6 months, leaving a balance of 16 years 6 months. For being a first offender, I deduct 1 year 6 months, leaving a balance of 15 years imprisonment. On count no. 1, I sentence you to 15 years imprisonment.
  6. On count no. 3, I repeat the above process and sentence.
  7. In summary, your sentences are as follows:
  8. Because of the totality principle of sentencing, I direct that the above sentences be made concurrent to each other, making a final sentence of 15 years imprisonment.
  9. Mr. Salacieli Ratumaidravuwalu, for raping the complainant as alleged in counts no. 1 and 3 of the information, I sentence you to 15 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 12 years imprisonment, effective forthwith.
  10. In addition to the above, a permanent domestic violence order with standard non-molestation conditions is issued for the safety of the complainant. This order will remain subject to the orders of this court.
  11. The name of the complainant is permanently suppressed to protect her privacy.
  12. You have 30 days to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Salesi Temo
Judge

Solicitor for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva.
Solicitor for the Accused : Legal Aid Commission, Suva.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2020/394.html