Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
[CRIMINAL JURISDICTION]
MISC CASE NO. HAM 089 OF 2020
ILAITIA DOKO
V
THE STATE
Date of Decision : 13 May 2020
DECISION
[1] The Accused is charged with five counts of rape of his daughter. The trial is pending before the High Court.
[2] The Court refused to grant the Accused bail on the ground that he was likely to interfere with the prosecution witnesses who are closely related to him (Application No 387/19).
[3] He now submits a fresh application using the standard bail form.
[4] Section 30 (7) of the Bail Act states that a court that has power to hear a fresh application for bail after it had been refused, may, if not satisfied that there are special facts or circumstances that justify the making of a afresh application, refuse to hear the application.
[5] After considering the application submitted in person by the Accused, the Court is satisfied that there are no special facts or circumstances to renew the application for bail.
[6] The renewed application is summarily refused.
...........................................
Hon. Mr Justice Daniel Goundar
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2020/310.html