PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2020 >> [2020] FJHC 199

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Siva [2020] FJHC 199; HAC324.2018S (6 March 2020)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 324 OF 2018S


STATE
vs
INOKE SIVA


Counsels : Mr. E. Samisoni for State
Ms. T. Kean and Ms. M. Cobona for Accused
Hearings : 2, 3, 4 and 5 March, 2020.
Summing Up : 6 March, 2020.
Judgment : 6 March, 2020.
_________________________________________________________________________

JUDGMENT
_________________________________________________________________________


  1. The three assessors had returned with a unanimous opinion finding the accused guilty as charged.
  2. Obviously, the three assessors had accepted the prosecution’s version of events, which meant they had accepted the prosecution’s witnesses’ evidence.
  3. It would also appear from the above opinion that the three assessors had rejected the accused’s sworn denials.
  4. I had reviewed the evidence called in the trial and I had directed myself in accordance with the summing up I delivered to the assessors today.
  5. The assessors’ unanimous opinion was not perverse. It was open to them to reach such conclusion on the evidence.
  6. Assessors are there to assist the trial judge come to a decision on whether or not the accused was guilty as charged. Assessors represent the public, and their opinions must be treated with respect.
  7. Like the assessors, I find the prosecution’s six witnesses’ evidence as credible, and I accept them. I accept that the accused voluntarily admitted the offence to police when caution interviewed on 23.7.18. I accept that his confession were the truth. The accused said PW2, the caution interview officer, did the not assault or threaten him.
  8. I also accept the State’s circumstantial evidence as outlined in the summing up.
  9. Given the above, I accept the three assessors’ unanimous guilty opinion. I find the accused guilty as charged and convict him accordingly.
  10. Assessors thanked and released.

Salesi Temo

JUDGE


Solicitor for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva. Solicitor for the Accused : Legal Aid Commission, Suva.



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2020/199.html