You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Fiji >>
2020 >>
[2020] FJHC 199
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
State v Siva [2020] FJHC 199; HAC324.2018S (6 March 2020)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 324 OF 2018S
STATE
vs
INOKE SIVA
Counsels : Mr. E. Samisoni for State
Ms. T. Kean and Ms. M. Cobona for Accused
Hearings : 2, 3, 4 and 5 March, 2020.
Summing Up : 6 March, 2020.
Judgment : 6 March, 2020.
_________________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
_________________________________________________________________________
- The three assessors had returned with a unanimous opinion finding the accused guilty as charged.
- Obviously, the three assessors had accepted the prosecution’s version of events, which meant they had accepted the prosecution’s
witnesses’ evidence.
- It would also appear from the above opinion that the three assessors had rejected the accused’s sworn denials.
- I had reviewed the evidence called in the trial and I had directed myself in accordance with the summing up I delivered to the assessors
today.
- The assessors’ unanimous opinion was not perverse. It was open to them to reach such conclusion on the evidence.
- Assessors are there to assist the trial judge come to a decision on whether or not the accused was guilty as charged. Assessors represent
the public, and their opinions must be treated with respect.
- Like the assessors, I find the prosecution’s six witnesses’ evidence as credible, and I accept them. I accept that the
accused voluntarily admitted the offence to police when caution interviewed on 23.7.18. I accept that his confession were the truth.
The accused said PW2, the caution interview officer, did the not assault or threaten him.
- I also accept the State’s circumstantial evidence as outlined in the summing up.
- Given the above, I accept the three assessors’ unanimous guilty opinion. I find the accused guilty as charged and convict him
accordingly.
- Assessors thanked and released.
Salesi Temo
JUDGE
Solicitor for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva. Solicitor for the Accused : Legal Aid Commission,
Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2020/199.html