Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: HBC 89 of 2018
BETWEEN
NARENDRA PRASAD
PLAINTIFF
AND
PITA BERA
DEFENDANT
APPEARANCES/REPRESENTATION
PLAINTIFF : Mr K Chang [Legal Aid Commission]
DEFENDANT : In Person
RULING OF : Acting Master Ms Vandhana Lal
DELIVERED ON : 04 October 2018
JUDGMENT
[Section 169 application for vacant possession]
INTRODUCTION
Application is made pursuant to Section 169 of the Land Transfer Act.
There is an affidavit filed in support of his application.
In fairness and justice I had for allowed for these to be treated as his opposition and submission respectively as these were filed following orders from Court for him to file opposition and parties to file submissions.
By consent copies were made available to the Counsel for the Plaintiff on the hearing date.
(a) the last registered proprietor of the land;
(b) a lessor with power to re-enter where the lessee or tenant is in arrear for such period as may be provided in the lease and, in the absence of any such provision therein, when the lessee or tenant is in arrear for one month, whether there be or be not sufficient distress found on the premises to countervail such rent and whether or not any previous demand has been made for the rent;
(c) a lessor against a lessee or tenant where a legal notice to quit has been given or the term of the lease has expired.
He had annexed to his Affidavit Copy Probate confirming the grant to him as Sole Executor and Trustee.
He has also annexed to his Affidavit copy lease number 721802 which has recorded the transmission by Death to Narendra Prasad.
According to the Plaintiff, the Defendant had illegally moved into the building without his consent or approval.
Despite asking him to vacate, the Defendant has wilfully refused to do the same.
The Plaintiff wishes to develop the land and fulfil his duties as the executor and trustee of the Estate of the deceased.
A notice to vacate was served on the Defendant on 30 November 2018. The Defendant has failed to vacate the property.
He did so and carried out certain maintenance works totalling up to $5, 000 which cost includes repairing the water pipe.
He has started farming on the land.
Execution of the above order is stayed for 3 months.
................................
Vandhana Lal [Ms]
Acting Master
At Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2018/951.html