Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. HAM 094 OF 2013S
TEVITA GONEVOU
vs
THE STATE
Counsels : Ms. S. Vaniqi for Accused
Ms. P. Madanavosa for State
Hearing : 24th May, 2013
Ruling : 24th May, 2013
Written Reasons : 20th September, 2013
WRITTEN REASONS FOR GRANT OF BAIL
Statement of Offence
AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: Contrary to Section 311 (1) (a) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009.
Particulars of Offence
TEVITA GONEVOU, JOELI SOAQALI and PETERO TUIVAKALEA on the 2nd day of April, 2013 at Pacific Harbour in the Central Division, stole $45,281.57 cash from Chandreshwaran Goundar.
3. It is well settled that, an accused person is entitled to bail pending trial, unless the interest of justice requires otherwise (section 3(1) of the Bail Act 2002). It is also well settled that, the primary consideration in deciding whether to grant bail is the likelihood of the accused person turning up in court to take his trial on the date arranged (section 17(2) of the Bail Act 2002). It is also well settled that, in order for the court to decide the above issue, it is mandatory for it to consider each of the factors mentioned in section 19 of the Bail Act 2002, that is, the likelihood of the accused surrendering to custody, the interest of the accused and the public interest and protection of the community.
Factor No. 1: The Likelihood of Accused Surrendering to Custody:
4. The accused is 46 years old, married with 2 young children aged 17 years and 7 years old. He is a caretaker at Reddy Estate Pacific Harbour, earning more than $100 per week. His wife does not work. He and his family resided at the estate. He had been at the estate for the previous 24 years. According to the prosecution, their case against the accused was strong. They relied on the complainant's direct evidence, and the accused's alleged confession, to ground a possible conviction. If found guilty, the accused faced a possible sentence of over 8 years imprisonment. Under this head, the accused's chances of bail are even, because he had resided, at the same address for the previous 24 years.
Factor No. 2: The Interest of the Accused's Person:
5. The accused will be tried next year. He has a counsel, and he can contact her to issue instructions, as and when he pleases. He is supporting a wife and 2 children, and had been residing at the same address for the previous 24 years. In my view, under this head, the accused's chances of bail are high.
Factor No. 3: The Public Interest and the Protection of the Community:
Conclusion:
Salesi Temo
JUDGE
Solicitor for Accused : Vaniqi Lawyers, Suva.
Solicitor for State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2013/469.html