You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Fiji >>
2009 >>
[2009] FJHC 50
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
State v Krishna [2009] FJHC 50; HAC115.2008 (20 February 2009)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FIJI ISLANDS
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO: HAC 115 OF 2008
STATE
V
SUBRAMANI KRISHNA
Mr. A Rayawa for State
Mr. R. Singh for Accused
Date of Sentence: 20 February 2009.
SENTENCE
- Subramani Krishna, you have been found guilty after a trial where the assessors were unanimous in their verdict against you. I accepted
the assessors verdict and convicted you on one count of Dangerous Driving Occasioning Grievous Harm, contrary to sections 97 [4]
[c] and 114 of the Land Transport Act 1998 [LTA]. This is your sentence.
- The liable penalty for this offence under section 114 of the LTA is a maximum fine $2000 and/or 2 years imprisonment and disqualification
for 12 months. In addition the court may order that up to 3 demerit points against the accused under section 59 [3] of LTA.
- Mr. Singh for the accused submits the following:
(i). Accused is a first offender in 48 years;
(ii). He is married with three children and with a stable family background;
(iii). He demonstrated accountability and was remorseful for this action;
(iv). No alcohol involved;
- Mr. Singh referred to the following cases where a non custodial sentence were passed by the court and upheld on appeal to the High
Court:
- As regards the possibility of the court considering the issue of disqualifying the accused from holding or obtaining a drivers licence,
Mr. Singh highlighted for the court’s consideration the following:
(i). Hardship that will be faced by the family if disqualification ordered;
(ii). Previous good character of the accused;
(iii). The existence of contributory fault on the part of the victim;
(iv). Driving is source of livelihood to accused family
- When court enquired whether the accused is in a financial position to pay a fine, Mr. Singh consulted his client and informed the
court that a fine of up to $1000 is payable if given time.
Sentence
- I have carefully considered the submission of Mr. Singh on behalf of the accused. I accept the following as relevant for mitigation
in this sentence determination:
(i). The accused cooperated with the police;
(ii). He accepted accountability for his actions early;
(iii). He is a first offender
(iv). Has had no accidents or previous convictions
- I also considered the fact that offence in this case was committed in July 2005 and there has been some delay in bringing this matter
to trial.
- The following factor as aggravating:
(i). The lack of care and attention of the accused when driving in a densely populated area;
- Having considered all the above, I conclude that justice in this dictates that a custodial term of imprisonment would be inappropriate.
I consider imposing a fine as the appropriate sentence. On enquiry to counsel for the accused, I am advised that the accused is able
to pay a fine, if the court is mindful of passing such a sentence.
- The sentence of this court is that the accused will pay a fine of $500.00. This fine must be paid no later than Friday 10 April 2009.
If the fine is not paid as ordered, the accused shall be imprisoned for 60 days.
- I also order that $300.00 of the fine be paid as compensation to the Temesio Tuicomia.
- I have considered whether the sentence should include a period of disqualification of the accused from holding or applying for a licence.
I accept the submission of Mr. Singh in this regard and the reasoning of my brother Justice Gates [now Chief Justice] in Turagatautoka v State [2003] FJHC 237; HAM 0058 of 2003 I have decided against ordering the disqualification of the accused licence. However, I would order that 3 demerit
points be awarded against him.
ORDERS
- I make the following orders:
(i). The accused to pay a fine of $500.00, no later than 10 April 2009. Failure to pay as ordered the accused will be imprisoned for
60 days;
(ii). A payment of $300.00 from the fine to be paid to the victim Temesio Tuicomia as victim compensation;
(iii). There will be 3 demerit points awarded against the accused.
Isikeli Mataitoga
JUDGE
At Suva
20 February 2009
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2009/50.html