PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Court of Appeal of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Court of Appeal of Fiji >> 2023 >> [2023] FJCA 181

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Land Transport Authority v Naicker [2023] FJCA 181; ABU0053.2023 (18 August 2023)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIJI
[On Appeal from the High Court]


CIVIL APPEAL NO. ABU 0053 of 2023
[High Court Civil Action No. HBC 18 of 2014]


BETWEEN:


LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
Appellant


AND:


1. PRAVEEN KRISHNA NAICKER
2. LEONI KACISAU
Respondents


Coram : Dr. Almeida Guneratne, P


Counsel : Ms A. Malani for the Appellant


Date of Hearing : 14th August, 2023
Date of Decision : 18th August, 2023


DECISION


[1] The appellant appealed against the Ruling dated 28th April, 2023 of the High Court.


[2] According to the Appellant, (as per the affidavit of Melvin Nitish Kumar dated 8th June, 2023, its employee), all efforts to serve the Notice of Appeal on the 2nd Respondent have failed (the 2nd Respondent himself having been an employee of the Appellant earlier).


[3] Thus, by the present ex parte summons dated 29th June, 2023 (filed on 8th June, 2023) the appellant was moving for substituted service of the notice of appeal on the 2nd Respondent.


[4] I have perused the said affidavit and gone through the Appellant’s written submissions dated 11th August, 2023.


[5] Being satisfied with the reasons adduced therein. I also had regard to the recent decision of mine in the case of Merchant Finance Limited v. Premium Plastic Ltd & 2 Others, ABU 0033 of 2022, 14th August, 2023.


[6] Consequently, I direct that the appellant may effect substituted service of his notice of appeal in terms of Order 65 (Rules 1(2), 4(1)(3)) and pursuant to any of the means envisaged in Rules 5(1)(a) or (b) or (c) of the said Order read with Rules 6 and 11 of the Court of Appeal Act.


Orders:


  1. The Appellant’s application to effect substituted service on the 2nd Respondent is allowed.
  2. After taking appropriate steps in that regard the appellant may move Court for the purpose of giving directions for consequential steps.

Hon. Justice Almeida Guneratne
PRESIDENT, COURT OF APPEAL



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJCA/2023/181.html