OPINIONS
 
OF THE
 
LAND AND TITLES DIVISION
 
OF THE
 
HIGH COURT OF AMERICAN SAMOA
 
(2004)

VI'I PITA, 
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
 
v.

MIRIAMA GARRETT and RICHARD GARRETT, 
Defendants/Counterclaimants/Cross-Claimants,
 
v.
 
TERRITORIAL REGISTRAR and SURVEY MANAGER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, MEKO AIUMU, 
Cross-Defendants.
____________________________________
 
TIMU LEVALE, by and on behalf of the TIMU FAMILY, 
Plaintiffs,

v.
 
RAY McMOORE, SESE McMOORE, and IOANE FE'AFE'AGA ENE,
 Defendants.
___________________________________
 
AMERICAN SAMOA GOVERNMENT,
 Plaintiff,
 
v.

HEIRS OF IOANE FE'AFE'AGA ENE, aka MAUGA FE'AFE'AGA ENE, TOLANI TELESO FUGA, ELETISE MATAGI WOLMAN, SENEVEFA PRITT, TIMU LEVALE, on behalf of the TIMU FAMILY, RAY McMOORE, SESE McMOORE aka SESE SAGAPOLU, VI'I PITA, PERALITA CANDY FUAVAI, ZAUINAOLA LAUAMA, FIALE NIKO, aka SOVITA SUAFO'A, SOVITA LIVING TRUST, MIRIAMA GARRETT, AMERIKA
SAMOA BANK, and DOES 1-10, 
Defendants.
____________________________________
 
TERRITORIAL REGISTRAR, on behalf of the HEIRS OF IOANE FE'AFE'AGA ENE, 
Claimants,
 
v.
 
TELESIA FE'A FIAME, on behalf of the FE'A FAMILY, ELETISE MATAGI WOLMAN, SENOUEFA PRITT, TAUINOLA
LAUAMA, FUGA TOLANI TELESO, VI'I PITA, FIALE LARSON, aka FIALE NIKO, aka SOVITA SUAFOA, AND SOVITA LIVING TRUST, 
Objectors.
_________________________________
 
SINAVAIANA M. ULUFALE, Administrator of the Estate of IOANE FE'AFE'AGA ENE, 
Claimant,
 
v.

TELESIA FE'A FIAME, FA'AMOE I HOLEWYNE, AFOA L. SU'ESU'E LUTU, on behalf of PEARLITA FUAVAI, MARSHALL ASHLEY on behalf of ELETISE M. WOLMAN, SENOUEFUA RITT, TAUINAOLA LAUAMA, FUGA TELESO, VI'I PITA, FIALE LARSON, aka FIALE NIKO, aka SOVITA SUAFO'A, and SOVITA LIVING TRUST, and FE'AFE'AGA TAUAMO II, 
Objectors.
________________________________
 
FA'AMAMAFA POLOA and LUSI POLOA, 
Intervenors.
 
High Court of American Samoa
Land and Titles Division
 
LT No. 14-93
LT No. 20-93
LT No. 10-95
LT No. 20-96
LT No. 01-98
 
July 9, 2004

[1] The court will deny a second T.C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion that is based on the same grounds as a prior T.C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion. 
 
[2] The court denied the motion for reconsideration, where the movant made the same arguments in a T.C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion as the arguments she made in a previous motion the court had classified as a T.C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion. 
 
Before RICHMOND, Associate Justice, LOGOAI, Chief Associate Judge, and TAPOPO, Associate Judge. 
 
Counsel: For Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/Defendant/Objector Vi'i Pita, and Defendants/Objectors Tolani Teleso Fuga, Eletise Matagi Wolman, Senouefa Pritt, Tauinaola Lauama, Fiale Niko, Sovita Living Trust, and Objector Marshall Ashley, Marshall Ashley and David P. Vargas 
 For Defendants/Counterclaimants/Cross-Claimants Miriama Garrett and Richard Garrett, Defendant Ioane Fe'afe'aga Ene, Claimants Sinaviana M. Ulufale, Administrator, and Estate of Ioane Fe'afe'aga Ene, David Wagner 
 For Defendant Peralita Candy Fuavai, and Objector Afoa L. Su'esu'e Lutu, Afoa L. Su'esu'e Lutu 
 For Objectors Telesia Fe'a-Fiame and Fe'afe'aga Tauamo II, Robert K. Maez 
 For Intervenors Fa'amamafa Poloai and Lusi Poloai, Katopau T. Ainuu 
 
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
 
We denied Objector Telesia Fe‟a Fiame‟s ("Fiame") motion for relief from judgment and for a new trial. Pita v. Garrett, 8 A.S.R.3d 234 (Land and Titles Div. 2004). Fiame moves for reconsideration. 
 
[1]-[2] We deny a second T.C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion that is based on the same grounds as a prior T.C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion. Tupuola v. Williams, 8 A.S.R.3d 270 (Land and Titles Div. 2004). Here, Fiame presents no new grounds for why we should reconsider our classification of the argument. Rehashing the actions of her prior counsel, Fiame makes essentially the same argument that we classified as T.C.R.C.P. 60(b)(1) when denying her motion for relief from judgment or new trial. Accordingly, we deny her motion for reconsideration. 
 
Order
 
The objector‟s motion for reconsideration is denied. 
 
It is so ordered. 
 
**********