PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

American Samoa Reports

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> American Samoa Reports >> 2002 >> [2002] ASLawRp 6

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

RDL, Inc v American Samoa Community College [2002] ASLawRp 6; 6 ASR3d 101 (26 February 2002)

OPINIONS


OF THE


TRIAL DIVISION


OF THE


HIGH COURT OF AMERICAN SAMOA


(2002)


RDL, INC.,/CIDA, INC., dba PACIFIC DESIGN BUILD COLLABORATIVE,
Plaintiffs,


v.


AMERICAN SAMOA COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Defendant.


High Court of American Samoa
Trial Division


CA No. 113-01


February 26, 2002


[1] The statute creating a state agency or state office may authorize, expressly or implicitly, engagement of counsel other than Attorney General.


[2] The American Samoa Community College has the power and responsibility to sue and be sued.


[3] The American Samoa Community College has the power to enter into contracts.


[4] Governmental agencies are not directly forbidden from employing attorneys other than the Attorney General, and the Attorney General is not anointed as the only option the government has for legal counsel.


[5] The statute creating the American Samoa College implies the power to hire outside counsel.


Before KRUSE, Chief Justice, LOGOAI, Chief Associate Judge, and ATIULAGI, Associate Judge.


Counsel: For Plaintiffs, Charles V. Ala'ilima
For Defendant, Paul F. Miller


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM


Plaintiff has moved to "dismiss" defendant's answer and counterclaim, arguing that defense counsel is a private attorney thus improperly representing defendant, a government agency. Plaintiff submits that only the Attorney General can properly represent a government agency. Citing to U.S. mainland caselaw, plaintiff contends that it is the role of the Attorney General to prosecute and defend legal actions involving agencies of state governments.


[1] While this is generally true, Attorneys General are by no means exclusive actors in the field of governmental representation. The statute creating a state agency or office may authorize, expressly or implicitly, the engagement of counsel, other than the Attorney General. Shute v. Frohmiller, 90 P.2d 998, 999 (Ariz. 1939); State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Riley, 69 P.2d 985, 987 (Cal. 1937) (agency's power to appoint counsel can be implied from general provisions of the statute creating agency); 7 AM. JUR. 2D Attorney General §§ 19-20 (1997, 2000). The specific grant of power to a state agency to "sue and be sued" has been held to constitute authority for it to appoint its own counsel. Watson v. Caldwell, 27 So. 2d 524, 528 (Fla. 1946).


[2-5] The statute authorizing the creation of the American Samoa Community College imbues the school with the power and responsibility to "sue and be sued." A.S.C.A. § 16.2002. The American Samoa Community College also has the power to enter into contracts. Id. We see no provision in the Territory's Constitution directly contrary to this interpretation. Agencies are not directly forbidden to employ attorneys other than the Attorney General, and the Attorney General is not anointed as the only option the government has for legal counsel. We therefore hold that the statute creating the college implies, in this instance, the power to hire outside counsel.


It is so ordered.


**********


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/as/cases/ASLawRp/2002/6.html